views
PROVIDENCE, R.I.: Brown University rebutted what the school calls spurious conspiracy claims” as it responded to an allegation that it is failing to comply with a 1998 agreement ensuring gender equity in sports.
The Ivy League school this year announced it was cutting several varsity women’s and men’s sports, and reducing them to club status. Several men’s teams were later restored.
In response, attorneys for Public Justice and the American Civil Liberties Union of Rhode Island filed a motion in federal court in June alleging that the Providence, Rhode Island, institution violated terms of the 1998 agreement to provide gender equity in varsity sports in order to comply with federal Title IX law.
The agreement stemmed from a lawsuit filed after Brown dropped womens gymnastics and volleyball as varsity sports.
Brown last month released internal documents, including emails from high-ranking school officials, that Public Justice and the ACLU said show Brown wanted to undermine and dismantle the 1998 agreement.
Brown responded Wednesday, calling those accusations baseless, and said the plaintiffs did not have access, when they filed the June motion, to the most recent documents that show Brown remains in compliance.
It is perhaps unsurprising that since plaintiffs came into possession of that data, they have resorted to spurious conspiracy claims and focused their energies on the process that led to Browns decision, rather than the hard data that makes Browns compliance with the Joint Agreement all but a certainty, the school said in a statement.
A voicemail seeking comment was left with the ACLU.
Brown President Christina Paxson said the school fully supports women’s sports.
As someone who loves sports, routinely goes to the games and cheers these women athletes on, I have no intention on backsliding on our commitment to equity for women. Its not only our legal obligation, its the right thing to do, she said in a statement.
Disclaimer: This post has been auto-published from an agency feed without any modifications to the text and has not been reviewed by an editor
Comments
0 comment